<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dutch frees included in press fund</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/11/15/dutch-frees-included-in-press-fund/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/11/15/dutch-frees-included-in-press-fund/</link>
	<description>Daily blogging on free daily newspapers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:25:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Piet Bakker</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/11/15/dutch-frees-included-in-press-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-42741</link>
		<dc:creator>Piet Bakker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/?p=1789#comment-42741</guid>
		<description>Dear Sakari,

The &#039;soft policy&#039; is my interpretation of course, and having a guest editor because of a &#039;marketing deal&#039; smells of mutual commercial interest. 

In the current circumstances newspapers have to think of new ways to make money and free newspapers have been much more innovative than paid papers. I actually am very much in favor if all that.

But still there is the fundamental question of independent reporting. It is a line easily crossed and the Blunt-deal was a good starting point for discussion in my view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sakari,</p>
<p>The &#8217;soft policy&#8217; is my interpretation of course, and having a guest editor because of a &#8216;marketing deal&#8217; smells of mutual commercial interest. </p>
<p>In the current circumstances newspapers have to think of new ways to make money and free newspapers have been much more innovative than paid papers. I actually am very much in favor if all that.</p>
<p>But still there is the fundamental question of independent reporting. It is a line easily crossed and the Blunt-deal was a good starting point for discussion in my view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sakari Pitkanen</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/11/15/dutch-frees-included-in-press-fund/comment-page-1/#comment-42034</link>
		<dc:creator>Sakari Pitkanen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/?p=1789#comment-42034</guid>
		<description>Dear Piet and blog readers.
Just a correction. 
1. Metro does not have a &quot;soft&quot; policy on commercial influences. 
2. Warner did not pay Metro anything and Metro did not pay Warner.
3. Yes, there was a huge marketing campaign for James Blunt being guest editor in Metro, from both Metro and Warner. Of course  as the event was unique. 
And I might also add that the event was a huge and global success for both Metro and Blunt. 

Sakari Pitkanen 
Global Editor In chief
Metro International</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Piet and blog readers.<br />
Just a correction.<br />
1. Metro does not have a &#8220;soft&#8221; policy on commercial influences.<br />
2. Warner did not pay Metro anything and Metro did not pay Warner.<br />
3. Yes, there was a huge marketing campaign for James Blunt being guest editor in Metro, from both Metro and Warner. Of course  as the event was unique.<br />
And I might also add that the event was a huge and global success for both Metro and Blunt. </p>
<p>Sakari Pitkanen<br />
Global Editor In chief<br />
Metro International</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

