<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian publishers downgrade audit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/04/17/canadian-publishers-downgrade-audit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/04/17/canadian-publishers-downgrade-audit/</link>
	<description>Daily blogging on free daily newspapers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:25:38 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Wojcicki</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/04/17/canadian-publishers-downgrade-audit/comment-page-1/#comment-16313</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Wojcicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 22:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/04/17/canadian-publishers-downgrade-audit/#comment-16313</guid>
		<description>Please note that I (Jack Wojcicki) am PR Counsel with motum b2b, AOR for CCAB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that I (Jack Wojcicki) am PR Counsel with motum b2b, AOR for CCAB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Wojcicki</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/04/17/canadian-publishers-downgrade-audit/comment-page-1/#comment-16307</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Wojcicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/04/17/canadian-publishers-downgrade-audit/#comment-16307</guid>
		<description>CCAB RESPONDS TO INACCURATE CLAIMS OF ‘LESS RIGOROUS’ AUDIT

Statements issued by the Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC) included comments made by spokespeople who were represented as independent, concerned media buyers and advertisers. What was not disclosed was that these individuals are directors or past directors of ABC, the major competitor of CCAB (a division of BPA World Wide). As such their comments are not without bias, nor are they representative of the industry in general. Furthermore, the statements made regarding the quality of a CCAB audit are false and unsubstantiated. CCAB’s audits are conducted according to the highest industry-accepted circulation auditing guidelines and will adhere to its universal principles of accuracy and full disclosure. Of greatest concern is that these statements are not constructive nor are they in the interests of anyone in the media industry. Read CCAB’s side at 

http://www.bpaww.com/about_bpa/industry_news/Open%20Letter%20to%20media%20auditing%20stakeholders.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CCAB RESPONDS TO INACCURATE CLAIMS OF ‘LESS RIGOROUS’ AUDIT</p>
<p>Statements issued by the Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC) included comments made by spokespeople who were represented as independent, concerned media buyers and advertisers. What was not disclosed was that these individuals are directors or past directors of ABC, the major competitor of CCAB (a division of BPA World Wide). As such their comments are not without bias, nor are they representative of the industry in general. Furthermore, the statements made regarding the quality of a CCAB audit are false and unsubstantiated. CCAB’s audits are conducted according to the highest industry-accepted circulation auditing guidelines and will adhere to its universal principles of accuracy and full disclosure. Of greatest concern is that these statements are not constructive nor are they in the interests of anyone in the media industry. Read CCAB’s side at </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bpaww.com/about_bpa/industry_news/Open%20Letter%20to%20media%20auditing%20stakeholders.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bpaww.com/about_bpa/industry_news/Open%20Letter%20to%20media%20auditing%20stakeholders.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Thursday squibs</title>
		<link>http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/04/17/canadian-publishers-downgrade-audit/comment-page-1/#comment-15770</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Thursday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newspaperinnovation.com/index.php/2008/04/17/canadian-publishers-downgrade-audit/#comment-15770</guid>
		<description>[...] news from NYT Co. (down) and Media General (way down). Meanwhile, three big Canadian publishers have changed circulation auditors for consistency, they say. Other suggest it&#8217;s because the new guys have looser definitions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] news from NYT Co. (down) and Media General (way down). Meanwhile, three big Canadian publishers have changed circulation auditors for consistency, they say. Other suggest it&#8217;s because the new guys have looser definitions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

